ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Major Outpatient Surgery (MOS) is an organizational and management model for surgical care that allows selected patients to be treated efficiently and safely. Our objective was to evaluate the quality of the different activities through standardized quality indicators, analyzing whether they have been modified during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational and comparative descriptive study of the quality indicators (QI) of MOS in our Pediatric Surgery Department from 2019 to 2020 was carried out. In accordance with the International Association for Ambulatory Surgery (IAAS) and the recommendations of the Spanish Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs, we assessed the basic quality and the degree of family satisfaction of patients undergoing MOS. RESULTS: A total of 848 and 652 interventions were performed in 2019 and 2020, respectively, with a mean age of 6 and 7 years. 539 (ambulatory rate (AR) 63.6%) and 465 (AR 71.3%) MOS surgeries were conducted in 2019 and 2020. In 2019, the overall substitution rate (SR) was 96.8%, hospitalization rate (HR) was 1.67%, suspension rate was 5.94%, and readmission rate was 1.48%. In 2020, the overall IS was 98.3%, HR was 0.86%, suspension rate was 4.73%, and readmission rate was 1.72%. No differences were found in terms of satisfaction between 2020 and 2019. CONCLUSIONS: QI allow us to know and analyze the performance and results of the different management units. In our department, the COVID-19 pandemic has not reduced the quality of CMA care.
INTRODUCCION: La cirugía mayor ambulatoria (CMA) es un modelo de gestión de asistencia quirúrgica que permite tratar de forma eficiente y segura a pacientes seleccionados. Nuestro objetivo es evaluar la calidad de esta actividad a través de indicadores de calidad estandarizados, analizando si se han visto modificados durante la pandemia por COVID-19. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Estudio descriptivo observacional y comparativo entre 2019 y 2020 de los indicadores de calidad (IC) de CMA de nuestra unidad de Cirugía Pediátrica. De acuerdo con la International Association for Ambulatory Surgery (IAAS) y las recomendaciones del Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, valoramos los indicadores de calidad básicos para CMA, así como el grado de satisfacción de las familias de pacientes intervenidos en este régimen. RESULTADOS: En total 848 y 652 intervenciones realizadas en 2019 y 2020, respectivamente, con edad media de 6 y 7 años. 539 (índice de ambulatorización (IA) 63,6%) y 465 (IA 71,3%) cirugías en régimen de CMA en 2019 y 2020. En 2019, índice de sustitución (IS) global 96,8%, índice de hospitalización (IH) 1,67%, índice de suspensión 5,94% e índice de reingreso 1,48%. En el año 2020, IS global 98,3%, IH 0,86%, índice de suspensión 4,73% e índice de reingreso 1,72%. No hemos encontrado diferencias en el grado de satisfacción entre ambos años. CONCLUSIONES: Los IC permiten conocer y analizar el funcionamiento y los resultados de las distintas unidades de gestión. En nuestra Unidad, la pandemia por COVID-19 no ha reducido la calidad de la asistencia en régimen de CMA.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , COVID-19 , Humans , Child , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Pandemics , HospitalizationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to trace contacts of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalised patients and determine the risk factors of infection in urban areas. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal analysis of contacts identified from index cases. METHODS: A contact tracing study was carried out in the Northern Metropolitan area of Barcelona, Spain, during the inter-epidemic lapse of May to July 2020, a period of low SARS-CoV-2 incidence. Index cases were notified from the referral hospital. Contacts were traced and followed up for 14 days. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was performed on day 0 and day 14 for contacts. RESULTS: In total, 368 contacts were identified from 81 index cases (median of seven contacts per index case), from which 308 were traced successfully. The median age of contacts was 28 years, 62% (223 of 368) were men. During the follow-up period, 100 contacts tested positive for COVID-19 (32.5% [95% confidence interval {CI} = 27.3-38.0]), with a secondary infection rate of 48.3% (95% CI = 40.8-55.9) among housemates. Clusters of index and respective contacts tended to aggregate within disadvantaged neighbourhoods (P < 0.001), and non-national index cases (N = 28, 34.1%) resulted in higher secondary infection rates compared with nationals (51.0% [95% CI = 41.0-60.9] vs 22.3% [95% CI = 16.8-28.8]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Disadvantaged communities experience a disproportionate burden of COVID-19 and may act as infection reservoirs. Contact tracing with a cross-cutting approach among these communities is required, especially during inter-epidemic periods.